The University of Dublin Calendar refers to various levels of plagiarism. What constitutes plagiarism at a particular level, and the consequences of being found to have committed plagiarism at that level, are detailed below.
Nothing provided for under the summary procedure diminishes or prejudices the disciplinary powers of the Junior Dean under the 2010 Consolidated Statutes.
**Please read the matrix in full before any determination is made as to the level of plagiarism which applies.**
|
Range of Penalties |
Characteristics of Offence |
---|---|---|
Level 1 |
You receive an informal verbal warning from the Director of Undergraduate Teaching and Learning/Postgraduate Teaching and Learning. |
You have little previous exposure to the norms and conventions of different types of academic work (essays, reports, group or individual projects, dissertations, presentations, etc.) or you bring different cultural assumptions to your work. |
The piece of work in question is inadmissible. You are required to rephrase and reference correctly all plagiarised elements. Other content should not be altered. The resubmitted work will be assessed and marked without penalty. |
Your work* demonstrates one or more of the following: |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Level 1 Plagiarism is not deemed to be academic misconduct. |
Generally, only small amounts of material (text, graph, computer code, images, etc.) are unacknowledged. If more substantial amounts are involved, the offence should be classified as Level 2 or 3 plagiarism. |
|
Level 2 |
You receive a formal written warning from the Head of School. |
Level 2 Plagiarism occurs when you should have been aware of what constitutes plagiarism. |
The piece of work in question is inadmissible. You are required to rephrase and reference correctly all plagiarised elements. Other content should not be altered. The resubmitted work will receive a reduced or capped mark (at the pass mark) depending on the seriousness/extent of plagiarism. |
Your work* demonstrates one or more of the following: |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Level 2 Plagiarism is considered as academic misconduct. |
|
|
Level 3 |
You receive a formal written warning from the Head of School. |
Level 3 Plagiarism occurs when you should have been aware of what constitutes plagiarism. |
The piece of work in question is inadmissible. There is no opportunity for resubmission with corrections. The student is required to submit a new piece of work as a supplemental assessment during the next available session. Provided the work is of passing standard, the assessment mark and the module mark will be capped at the pass mark. Discretion lies with the Senior Lecturer/Dean of Undergraduate Studies and the Dean of Graduate Studies (as appropriate) in cases where there is no standard opportunity for a supplemental assessment under applicable course regulations. |
Your work* demonstrates one or more of the following: |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Level 3 Plagiarism is considered as academic misconduct. |
|
|
Level 4 |
Case referred to the Junior Dean for disciplinary procedures. |
Level 4 plagiarism cannot normally be dealt with under summary procedures (Levels 1-3 above). For example, plagiarism in the context of postgraduate theses or dissertations will always be categorised as Level 4. The following constitute examples of Level 4 plagiarism: |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
*The term 'work' refers to individual or group work |